US Senate Judiciary Committee seeks changes to crypto bill… “Developer immunity could create an enforcement gap”
공유하기
Summary
- The US Senate Judiciary Committee said it has publicly raised concerns that developer-protection provisions in a crypto market structure bill could weaken enforcement against illicit fund flows.
- The committee said the provisions could create an enforcement gap for decentralized platforms and unlicensed money transmission, adding that language weakening the government’s enforcement authority should be removed.
- The pushback has put Senate discussions on the crypto bill back into uncertainty, and the market is increasingly viewing the balance between developer protections and illicit-funds enforcement as a key issue in future legislative debates.
The leadership of the US Senate Judiciary Committee has publicly raised concerns, calling for the removal of developer-protection provisions from a cryptoasset (cryptocurrency) market structure bill. The committee argues the provisions could weaken enforcement against illicit fund flows.
According to Cointelegraph, a crypto-focused outlet, the Judiciary Committee chair and the top Democratic member said in a letter to the leadership of the Senate Banking Committee that “the current bill could create an enforcement gap for decentralized platforms.” They said they are concerned criminal groups could exploit regulatory blind spots.
At issue is a developer-protection provision included in the draft bill. It specifies that blockchain software development or network maintenance activities would be excluded from the scope of laws related to money transmission. The Judiciary Committee argued this could make it harder to hold parties accountable for unlicensed money transmission.
The committee also said there was insufficient prior consultation during the drafting process, adding that language weakening the government’s enforcement authority should be removed.
The pushback has thrown Senate deliberations over the crypto bill back into uncertainty. With the vote already delayed to secure bipartisan agreement, even if the bill reaches the floor, substantial coordination will likely be needed for it to pass.
The outlet reported that “the market is increasingly viewing the balance between protecting developers and cracking down on illicit funds as a key issue in future legislative discussions.”
