Kim Sang-hoon, Min Byeong-deok: “The Bithumb incident has nothing to do with curbs on major shareholders’ stakes at exchanges”

Uk Jin

Summary

  • It was reported that criticism has emerged that the Financial Services Commission (FSC) is using Bithumb’s erroneous Bitcoin (BTC) payout incident as a pretext to pursue limits on major shareholders’ ownership stakes at virtual-asset exchanges.
  • Rep. Kim Sang-hoon said the incident was caused by a system flaw at Bithumb and that it should not be linked to restrictions on major shareholders’ stakes in the exchange industry.
  • Rep. Min Byeong-deok criticized the discussion of ownership structure, saying the incident would not have occurred had the Digital Asset Basic Act been passed promptly and that the debate must not mislead the public.
Photo=Rep. Kim Sang-hoon’s Facebook
Photo=Rep. Kim Sang-hoon’s Facebook

Criticism has emerged that the Financial Services Commission (FSC) may be using Bithumb’s erroneous Bitcoin (BTC) payout incident as a pretext to push for limits on the ownership stakes of controlling shareholders at virtual-asset (cryptocurrency) exchanges.

On the 11th (Korea time), Rep. Kim Sang-hoon of the People Power Party said at a plenary meeting of the National Assembly’s Political Affairs Committee that the incident “was caused by a system flaw at Bithumb,” adding that “the system flaw itself should not be linked to restrictions on major shareholders’ stakes in the virtual-asset exchange industry when stating a position.”

Rep. Min Byeong-deok of the Democratic Party of Korea criticized financial authorities, saying that “having served on the Political Affairs Committee for six years, I have continuously raised the issue of exchanges’ monopolization of fee profits and the limits of self-regulation,” and that this incident “is an accident that would not have happened if the Digital Asset Basic Act proposed in the National Assembly had been passed promptly.”

He continued, saying, “I don’t understand why they are forcing an argument to bring up the ownership structure,” and stressed, “Does changing the ownership structure solve the problem? The public must not be misled.”

This is seen as taking issue with the FSC having delayed legislation on the grounds of matters related to limits on exchanges’ controlling shareholders’ stakes.

publisher img

Uk Jin

wook9629@bloomingbit.ioH3LLO, World! I am Uk Jin.
hot_people_entry_banner in news detail bottom articles
hot_people_entry_banner in news detail mobile bottom articles
What did you think of the article you just read?




PiCK News

Trending News