'Digital Asset Hegemony Competition and South Korea's Strategy' Forum U.S. Promotes Virtual Assets Under Trump's Leadership "South Korea Must Respond Quickly" Discussion on Legislative Direction Including Stablecoin Introduction Financial Services Commission "Will Accelerate Preparation of Phase 2 Virtual Asset Law" "U.S. President Donald Trump views virtual assets (cryptocurrency) as a new phenomenon and is responding to it. We must also respond quickly in line with this. While the direction of policy is important, speed is also a very important aspect." Min Byung-deok, a member of the Democratic Party of Korea, stated this in his opening remarks at the 'Digital Asset Hegemony Competition and South Korea's Strategy' forum held at the National Assembly Hall in Yeouido, Seoul on the 2nd. The forum, co-hosted by Min Byung-deok's office and the Digital Asset Policy Forum, was organized to discuss the global digital asset industry hegemony competition and our development direction. Min Byung-deok emphasized the need to secure clarity in domestic virtual asset regulations. He added, "For the development of the virtual asset market, it is necessary to clearly define what can and cannot be done. If this is achieved, I believe South Korea can lead this market." Lim Jong-in, representative of the Digital Asset Policy Forum, also pointed out the situation where virtual asset issues are not being discussed quickly in the country during his opening remarks. He said, "The U.S. designated Bitcoin (BTC) as a strategic reserve asset through an executive order by President Trump last March, and a virtual asset spot ETF already emerged last year," adding, "It is regrettable that we, despite being a digital powerhouse, have not been able to advance quickly in the virtual asset field." Lim further stated, "Due to various political environments last year, discussions on virtual asset issues were delayed, but I hope that the contents discussed in today's forum will be reflected in the Financial Services Commission's policy in the second half of the year." Discussion on Stablecoin Introduction and Virtual Asset Legislative Direction In the subsequent presentation, the introduction of stablecoins and the legislative direction of virtual assets were discussed. Lee Jong-soo, a professor at Seoul National University's Business School, explained about the adoption of stablecoins in the U.S., "In fiat-backed stablecoins, the U.S. dollar-based stablecoins have already secured an 80% market share. As demand for stablecoins increases, so does the demand for U.S. cash and bonds. This is why the U.S. chose stablecoins strategically instead of a central bank digital currency (CBDC)." Ultimately, the U.S. strategically chose stablecoins to maintain dollar hegemony. Professor Lee pointed out, "Recently, many tasks traditionally handled by traditional finance are being digitized and tokenized on the blockchain. In this situation, there are already digitalized bank app services in our country, and people are questioning why stablecoins are necessary," adding, "It is time to discuss policies that achieve a proper balance between stablecoins and central bank digital currencies (CBDC)." Ryu Kyung-eun, an associate professor at Korea University's School of Law, gave a lecture on the direction of the domestic virtual asset basic law through the U.S. case. Associate Professor Ryu stated, "There is a need to clarify the regulatory authorities' perspective on the virtual asset market through the basic law on virtual assets." He further mentioned the disappointment with the user protection law, saying, "The most disappointing aspect of the virtual asset user protection law is the omission of disclosure regulations. There was a question about regulating unfair trading without disclosure regulations. Therefore, when discussing the basic law, I believe it is necessary to establish a system for disclosure." He also emphasized the need for diversification of the virtual asset industry. He stated, "The current virtual asset industry is quite exchange-centric. There is a need to diversify this, and the first step for this is allowing corporate accounts." Financial Services Commission "Will Accelerate Preparation of Phase 2 Virtual Asset Law" In the final discussion, industry figures and financial authorities shared their thoughts on the development direction of virtual asset policies. Kim Jae-jin, vice chairman of the Digital Asset Exchange Joint Consultative Body (DAXA), pointed out the negative perception of the term 'virtual asset' and suggested the need to change the name to 'digital asset.' He emphasized, "The term 'virtual asset,' a simple translation of 'virtual asset,' carries negative connotations such as fiction and non-existence. The first step in industry development is the transition of terminology." Kim further argued that institutional arrangements are needed to attract foreign capital to secure competitiveness in the digital asset industry. He pointed out, "Domestic digital asset investors have already moved to overseas exchanges, but conversely, there is no influx of foreign investors," adding, "It is urgent to discuss improving accessibility for foreign investors in the digital asset market." Kim Sung-jin, head of the Virtual Asset Division at the Financial Services Commission, said that they will accelerate the establishment of a regulatory foundation. Kim stated, "The Financial Services Commission aims to push for the legislation of the phase 2 law in the second half of this year. However, many people are saying that we need to speed up. I agree with their opinions and plan to push forward as quickly as possible." He also mentioned the need to ease regulations on domestic exchanges. He explained, "There are several regulations applied only to our country's exchanges, and I fully agree with the opinion that they should be eased to match global trends. In fact, the main focus in opening corporate accounts was to provide global consistency to our country's exchanges." Kim also mentioned that they will carefully consider the currently hot topic of stablecoins. Kim stated, "Currently, there is a global focus on the payment function of stablecoins, and tests are being conducted to expand this to general commercial transactions. The Financial Services Commission is also aware of this demand and will consider how to reflect it in the phase 2 legislation, and we will think a lot about it practically."
April 2PiCK