| Kim Seojun, CEO of Hashed In December 2024, a historic milestone was reached in the financial markets. The total assets under management (AUM) of Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) surpassed those of traditional gold ETFs for the first time. Achieved in just 11 months, this performance demonstrates astonishing growth speed. As of November 2025, Bitcoin ETF AUM remains at about 110 billion dollars, and competition with gold ETFs continues. However, market perception remains cold. Despite overwhelming quantitative growth, Bitcoin does not receive the same 'safe and substantial' treatment as gold. It swings with every tremor in the Nasdaq and is still classified as a 'risk-on' asset. Where does this 'paradox of digital gold' originate, and when might Bitcoin finally don a true crown? Fundamental gap: 'Scale' has grown but 'trust' and 'constitution' remain immature Gold has accumulated trust as a store of value over 5,000 years of human history. It endured the fall of the Roman Empire, the Great Depression, two world wars, the collapse of the Bretton Woods system, and the 2008 financial crisis. By contrast, Bitcoin's 16 years are but a blink in financial history. Market trust follows the Lindy Effect: the longer something endures, the more likely it is to endure further. Bitcoin has yet to experience a true global financial crisis or a large-scale geopolitical shock. A substantial portion of the 120 billion dollars that has flowed into Bitcoin ETFs currently comes from hedge funds and aggressive institutional investors seeking 'return maximization' and 'volatility bets.' To them, Bitcoin is closer to an extreme version of 'high-risk, high-reward tech stocks' than 'digital gold.' The difference is stark when examining the composition of gold ETF capital. Central banks account for 22%, pension funds 18%, insurers 15%, individual long-term investors 25%, and others 20%. By contrast, Bitcoin ETFs are composed of 35% hedge funds and 25% trading desks — 60% in short-term speculative capital — with venture capital at 15%, individual short-term investors 20%, and others 5%. This difference in capital composition is vividly reflected in responses to market volatility. When markets become unstable, Bitcoin is not held like gold but is among the first assets to be liquidated alongside the Nasdaq. Quantitative growth has been achieved, but qualitative constitution still remains within risk preference. Since 2024, the 60-day correlation coefficient between Bitcoin and the Nasdaq 100 index has averaged 0.65. This implies that Bitcoin is still perceived as an 'extreme version of tech stocks.' By contrast, the correlation between gold and the Nasdaq fluctuates between -0.15 and +0.1, showing independence or negative correlation. A more serious issue is behavior during crises. During the Fed's rate-hike cycle in 2022, when the Nasdaq fell 33%, Bitcoin fell nearly double at 64%. Over the same period, gold fell by only 3%. This is clear evidence that Bitcoin is still treated as the 'king of risk assets.' Shocking reversal of 2025: the resurgence of gold Although Bitcoin ETFs overtook gold ETFs at the end of 2024, the situation dramatically reversed in 2025. As of August 2025, gold ETFs surged to 325 billion dollars, while Bitcoin ETFs remained at 162 billion dollars. More striking was the performance gap. Gold prices jumped 60% year-to-date to reach a historic high of 4,000 dollars per ounce, while Bitcoin rose only 20% in the same period. This performance gap raised serious questions among Bitcoin investors. Doubts spread within the community asking, 'Can Bitcoin truly become digital gold?' Some long-term investors began reconsidering portfolio allocations. Gold's resurgence was not a mere temporary phenomenon but was driven by structural factors. Chief among them was large-scale buying by central banks. Central bank gold purchases in the first half of 2025 reached record levels. China, India, and Russia sharply increased their gold holdings to reduce dollar dependence. Emerging economies like Turkey and Poland also expanded the share of gold in their foreign-exchange reserves and joined this trend. Intensified geopolitical uncertainty also fueled demand for gold. Continued U.S.-China tensions created a new cold-war-like divide, and instability in the Middle East increased, prompting investors to seek proven safe assets. Added to this were trade tensions arising from global supply-chain realignment, further highlighting gold's appeal. Concerns about inflation and currency depreciation also reinforced gold preference. As fiscal deficits widened in major countries and confidence in fiat currencies declined, demand for gold exploded in many countries with persistently negative real interest rates. Decisively, investors increasingly preferred tangible assets over digital ones. This reality posed deep dilemmas for Bitcoin supporters. The biggest shock was psychological. As the 'digital gold' narrative weakened, the Bitcoin community faced an identity crisis. The reality that institutional investors still choose gold in times of crisis was a painful lesson, and criticism resurfaced that Bitcoin's high volatility undermines its safe-asset status. Investment strategies were also fundamentally reconsidered. Surprisingly, even some Bitcoin maximalists began increasing their gold allocations, and hybrid strategies like 'Bitcoin 60% + Gold 40%' gained attention. There was a renewed reassessment of the importance of long-term value preservation over short-term gains. This reality shows that Bitcoin still has a long way to go: quantitative growth has been achieved, but qualitative transformation remains incomplete. Four key triggers for Bitcoin's qualitative leap The first gateway for Bitcoin to be recognized as true digital gold is strategic adoption by long-term institutional investors. What is needed now is not simple investment but formal declaration. If the world's top 10 sovereign wealth funds officially announce allocation of 2–5% of their portfolios to Bitcoin, and major U.S. pension funds grant Bitcoin 'strategic asset' status, that would be pivotal. In particular, codifying long-term investment policies such as 'hold for more than 10 years' to recognize Bitcoin as a 'core asset class' rather than a mere investment is important. Recent moves: In 2025, several institutional investors have been increasing Bitcoin exposure. BlackRock's IBIT has grown to 97 billion dollars and is leading institutional demand, and some U.S. state pension funds are considering Bitcoin ETF investments. The Abu Dhabi Investment Committee (ADIC) has also started investing in Bitcoin ETFs, though it is still early and represents a small portion of its overall portfolio. Second, official national-level adoption can fundamentally change Bitcoin's status. The most powerful catalyst would be if major G7 central banks allocated more than 1% of their foreign-exchange reserves to Bitcoin, or if the International Monetary Fund (IMF) included Bitcoin in the Special Drawing Rights (SDR) basket — that would completely change the rules of the game. If Basel III regulations were revised to recognize Bitcoin as Tier 1 capital, banks worldwide could hold Bitcoin without capital burden. So far, El Salvador and the Central African Republic's legal-tender adoptions are symbolic. Real change begins when major economic powers move. Recent moves: In November 2025, a proposal was submitted to the U.S. House of Representatives to add Bitcoin as a national strategic asset. This suggests the U.S. is beginning to seriously consider official adoption of Bitcoin. Third, practice matters more than theory. For Bitcoin to be recognized as a true safe asset, it must exhibit gold-like behavior in real crises. Bitcoin should spike during a banking crisis, or rise alongside gold during geopolitical shocks in the Taiwan Strait or the Middle East. It must also demonstrate that it can function as an alternative currency when major currencies collapse. Recent moves: When Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) collapsed in March 2023, Bitcoin surged more than 20% in one instance. However, this was a single event and has not yet become a consistent pattern. For Bitcoin to be recognized as a true safe asset, such cases must be observed repeatedly. Fourth, technical evolution and infrastructure improvements are essential. Layer-2 solutions like the Lightning Network must become widespread for everyday payments, and major banks must mainstream direct custody services. The share of renewable energy used in Bitcoin mining must exceed 90% to fully allay ESG concerns, and resistance to quantum computing must be ensured to guarantee long-term security. Recent moves: As of 2025, the number of Lightning Network channels has surpassed 150,000, and major banks are scaling up Bitcoin custody services. In particular, the share of renewable energy in Bitcoin mining has exceeded 50%, alleviating some ESG concerns. Forecast timeline: 2026–2030, an era of paradigm shift First phase (2026~2027): ETF inflows stabilize and Bitcoin's daily volatility settles below 5%. Institutional investor share surpasses 60%, increasing market maturity, and the first major G20 country begins official review of Bitcoin as a reserve asset. Also, one or two major pension funds will declare Bitcoin a 'strategic asset.' Second phase (2028~2029): Formal institutional integration advances. Two to three major sovereign wealth funds officially expand Bitcoin investments, Basel regulatory reforms pass making it easier for banks to hold Bitcoin, and the correlation between Bitcoin and the Nasdaq falls below 0.3, strengthening Bitcoin's character as an independent asset. Bitcoin will be partially proven as a safe asset in its first major financial crisis. Final phase (2030): Bitcoin finally establishes the status of 'digital gold.' The first G7 central bank allocates Bitcoin into foreign-exchange reserves, and Bitcoin fully demonstrates safe-asset roles across multiple crisis scenarios. Volatility falls to the 20–25% range, reaching levels similar to gold, and Bitcoin becomes an essential element of global asset allocation. Beyond the threshold of time Bitcoin has already achieved 'quantitative growth.' Surpassing gold ETFs in December 2024 is evidence. However, as gold's resurgence in 2025 shows, to become true 'digital gold' Bitcoin needs the test of time, qualitative transformation in the nature of capital, and verification in practice. Major change will begin from 2026. As the first G20 country starts official review, major pension funds declare strategic asset status, and partial verification occurs in real crises, Bitcoin will gradually shed the 'risk asset' label and is expected to wear the 'digital gold' crown around 2030. We stand at the dawn of a massive paradigm shift. The 16-year journey of Bitcoin challenging 5,000 years of gold history has only just begun. ■ Kim Seojun, CEO of Hashed — Biography △ Early graduate of Seoul Science High School △ Graduated from the Department of Computer Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology △ Chief Product Officer (CPO) and Co-founder of Nori △ CEO of Hashed △ Venture Partner at SoftBank Ventures △ Advisory member of the National Assembly's Special Committee on the Fourth Industrial Revolution △ Member of the Ministry of Education's Future Education Committee The views expressed by external contributors may differ from the editorial stance of this publication.
November 24PiCK